“[T]he great enemy of truth is very often not the lie – deliberate, contrived and dishonest – but the myth – persistent, persuasive, and unrealistic. Too often we hold fast to the clichés of our forebears. We subject all facts to a prefabricated set of interpretations. We enjoy the comfort of opinion without the discomfort of thought.” (John F Kennedy, June 11, 1962)
“The noble savage myth stated that mankind is intrinsically good at the primitive state but that civilization degrades him/her. This myth, which raised many debates about man’s true nature, served as a concealed critic of Western society from the 17th century onward and was based on the dichotomy between man at the state of nature and man in civilisation.”
“Although the origins of the term are attributed to Swiss philosopher Jean-Jacques Rousseau, the term ‘Noble Savage’ was coined by the French explorer and lawyer Marc Lescarbot in his New World writings in 1609. Today, … this myth is still prevalent in conservation.” (Rodrigue-Allouche)
“There is a widespread myth that ‘primitive’ people are ‘natural conservationists’ and live in a state of ‘ecological balance’ without any appreciable effect on the environment.”
“The impact of prehistoric people on island biota is a convincing rebuttal of this myth. The effect has invariably been highly destructive, not only to birds but to most types of organisms.” (Milberg and Tyrberg)
“Milberg and Tyrberg argue that there is still a pervasive notion – the ‘environmentalist myth’ – that ‘primitive’ people are ‘natural conservationists’ living in a state of ‘ecological balance,’ without causing any significant deleterious effects to their environment …”
“… this naive view, derived from a romanticized concept of the ‘noble savage’ … is simply untenable in the 21st century.” (Perez)
Kirch noted that “the popular orthodoxy of indigenous peoples in symbiotic ‘harmony’ with nature should not go unquestioned.” (Kirch)
“Evidence obtained from archaeological and ancillary studies of paleoenvironment suggests that the prehistoric Polynesians had a far greater impact on the Hawaiian ecosystem than has heretofore been realized. Such impact began with the introduction, by Polynesians, of exotic plants and animals.”
“The cumulative effects of forest clearance and habitat modification through the use of fire led to major changes in lowland ecology. Among the consequences of this transformation of the Hawaiian landscape were the extinction of endemic species, alteration of vegetation communities, and erosion.” (Kirch)
“Although it is believed that native Hawaiian avifauna was affected by several interdependent factors, the extensively documented bird overkill by humans must have played a crucial role in their decline.”
“The extent to which humans contributed to bird demise may be unclear; however, as Berger argues, some birds – such as the ‘ō‘ō – went extinct in other islands, whereas the sole surviving ‘ō‘ō species in Kauai has ‘fewer yellow feathers than any of the other species’; this possibly helped it escape being overhunted.” (Perez)
“It is known that Hawaiians exploited birds both for meat and for their plumage, and predation was doubtless one of the factors leading to the massive avifaunal extinctions.” (Kirch)
“The ‘ō‘ū [honeycreeper] was at one time ‘ … common to all the larger Hawaiian islands’; ‘Next to [‘I‘ìwi], it is perhaps the most noticeable bird of the forest-birds of the islands’; however, its ‘… conspicuous bright yellow head and neck plumage’ were eagerly used for highly valued leis. Now the bird is gone.”
“Humans avidly consumed ‘ua‘u (petrel) meat, severely restricting the distribution of one of the most abundant birds in the Hawaiian Islands into just a minute fraction of its former range. Now the ‘ua‘u is an endangered bird, likely to become extinct in the near future.”
“That is the undeniable legacy of overexplotation and disregard of ancient Hawaiians toward their magnificent avifauna.” (Perez)
“The Hawaiian Islands have the dubious distinction of leading the world in numbers of historically extinct and currently endangered bird species; sadly, this unfortunate situation is not a recent phenomenon.”
“Bird extinctions after European discovery were extensive and are now well documented; however, native Polynesians caused extinctions of an even greater magnitude. Fossil evidence shows at least 50% of the original avifauna became extinct after Polynesians arrived in Hawai’i”. (Perez)
“Feathers were important symbols of power for Polynesians; in Hawai‘i, feathers were more highly prized than other types of property.”
“Feathers used for crafts were obtained from at least 24 bird species, however, the golden feathers of ‘ō‘ō and mamo birds made them primary targets for birdhunters; both birds became extinct by the late 1800s.”
“Feathers were utilized for many items, including ‘ahu‘ula [cloaks], mahiole [war helmets], and kāhili [standards]. Most garments utilized a considerable number of feathers; a cloak for Kamehameha consumed the golden feathers of 80,000 mamo birds.”
“Bird meat was an important food item for native Hawaiians. It is believed that most birds were killed after being plucked; historical sources mention ~30 bird species were consumed. The ‘ua‘u, a currently endangered seabird, was ruthlessly hunted and avidly eaten.” (Perez)
“Some authors prefer to disingenuously believe that birdcatchers plucked only a few feathers from each bird, then ‘set it free to raise its family and grow a new crop of feathers.’” (Perez)
In the first writing of Hawai‘i, Captain Cook’s Journal notes, “Amongst the articles which they brought to barter this day, we could not help taking notice of a particular sort of cloak and cap, which, even in countries where dress is more particularly attended to, might be reckoned elegant.”
“The first are nearly of the size and shape of the short cloaks worn by the women of England, and by the men in Spain, reaching to the middle of the back, and tied loosely before.”
“The ground of them is a network upon which the most beautiful red and yellow feathers are so closely fixed that the surface might be compared to the thickest and richest velvet, which they resemble, both as to the feel and the flossy appearance. …”
At the time of ‘Contact’, it was clear that when collection feathers birds were killed, as Cook’s Journal goes on to note, “We were at a loss to guess from whence they could get such a quantity of these beautiful feathers; but were soon informed as to one sort …”
“… for they afterward brought great numbers of skins of small red birds for sale, which were often tied up in bunches of twenty or more, or had a small wooden skewer run through their nostrils.”
“At the first, those that were bought consisted only of the skin from behind the wings forward; but we afterward got many with the hind part, including the tail and feet. The first, however, struck us at once with the origin of the sable formerly adopted, of the birds of paradise wanting legs, and sufficiently explained that circumstance. … (Cook’s Journal, Jan 1778)
“The scarlet birds, already described, which were brought for sale, were never met with alive; but we saw a single small one, about the size of a canary-bird, of a deep crimson colour; a large owl; two large brown hawks, or kites; and a wild duck.” (Cook’s Journal, Feb 1778)
“It is certainly true that various resource management measures (such as the imposition of a kapu, or ban, on certain fish) were enacted at times to reduce the impact of exploitation on certain resources. But the existence of a conservation ethic and its effectiveness are two different things; the former does not automatically imply the latter.”
“[W]e need to be clear [though,] that the arrival of Europeans in the islands led to far greater impacts on the ecosystems than anything that the Hawaiians wrought – with the introduction of ungulates and other invasive species, massive water diversion, vast plantation monocropping, and so forth”. (Kirch)
