“Liliʻuokalani County. Word was received from Honolulu by wireless telegraph yesterday, that the county bill has passed the Senate, changing the name of Maui to Liliuokalani and changing the county seat to Lahaina.” (Maui News, April 27, 1901)
While news announcement was premature (President Dole effectively vetoed the legislation,) a new County governance structure and other legislation were proposed in the first legislative session of the Legislature of the Territory of Hawaiʻi in 1901.
The first session started on February 20, 1901 and lasted a total of 127-days (Regular Session 58-days; Special Session 69-days – the last day of the ‘Extra Session’ was July 29, 1901) – today, pursuant to Article III, section 10, of the Hawaiʻi State Constitution:
“The legislature shall convene annually in regular session at 10:00 o’clock a.m. on the third Wednesday in January … Regular sessions shall be limited to a period of sixty days, and special sessions shall be limited to a period of thirty days.” (Hawaiʻi Constitution) (Further extensions are possible.)
That first legislative session of the Territorial Legislature was later nicknamed the ‘Lady Dog Legislature’. It relates to multiple measures and extensive discussion seeking amendment to the taxes charged on dogs (reducing the female dog tax from $3 to $1 – the rate on male dogs.)
“The provision for increasing the tax on female dogs to three dollars was enacted by the Legislature of 1898 for the purpose of improving the quality of dogs in the Hawaiian Islands, and incidentally of decreasing the number of inferior dogs. The higher tax on female dogs tends directly to this result.” (Governor’s Message)
The press criticized the legislature: “The stray dogs are being gathered in, and the weeping owners is beseeching the clemency of the Deputy Sheriff. Now is the time when the wiley Hawaiian and Portuguese entices the small dog into his premises and eases him of his collar and tag. The tag system for dogs is worthy of a Solomon.”
“Who invented it, is now lost among the mists of history. The honest man pays his dog tax and the dishonest rogue profits by it. It is reported by the dog catcher that the lady dogs are not grateful to the lady dog legislature. They used to take a pride, in their three dollar tags, and now they are only adorned with a dollar tag.” (Hawaiian Star, June 3, 1902)
Some suggest the criticism of the legislature was racially-based. In 1900, the Kanaka Maoli (aboriginal Hawaiians) had formed their own party, called the Home Rule Party, through merging two organizations, Hui Aloha ‘Āina and Hui Kālai‘āina, who had worked together to support Queen Lili‘uokalani and oppose annexation. (Silva)
However, it’s interesting to note that in 1901, 1903 and 1905 there was successive decline in representation by Home Rule candidates in the Legislature, although there continued to be a total of around 30-Hawaiians (out of 45) in the Legislature. (Report of the Governor, 1920)
The next election (1907,) there was only 1-Home Rule party member serving in the Senate, and none in the House; however, a total of 32-Hawaiians were in the Legislature. With Republicans dominating both chambers, it is clear that most of the Hawaiians were Republicans. (Report of the Governor, 1920) (While the Home Rule Party was race-based, the Republican Party was not.)
For the entirety of the nineteenth century, non-whites always made up at least ninety percent of the population of the Islands. At the time of the 1893 coup, whites made up approximately six percent of Hawai‘i’s population and faced a much larger and engaged native populace. (Williams)
However, the level of Hawaiian participation in the initial Legislatures has shown that Hawaiians did not need the ‘Home Rule’ race-based party to get representation in the local legislature. After another decade of election losses, the Home Rule Party was disbanded after the election of 1912. However, Hawaiian representation in the Legislature continued to be just under 30 – out of a total of 45 (15-Senators and 30-Representatives.)
Another proposed law “An Act providing for and creating certain counties in the Territory of Hawaii, and providing a form of government for such counties,” (as suggested in the initial paragraph, here.)
Various names were proposed for the counties, including, the Islands of Maui, Molokai, Lanai and Kahoʻolawe were to be called the County of Liliʻuokalani. Kauai and Niʻihau were to be called County of Lunalilo.
Oʻahu was to known as the County of Kalākaua; and the Island of Hawaiʻi was to have two counties: The County of Kauikeaouli (encompassing the districts of Hilo, Puna and Kaʻū) and the County of Kamehameha (encompassing the districts of Hāmākua, Kohala and Kona.) It, too, did not receive the Governor’s signature; Counties were later authorized in 1905.
In the end, only a small portion of the legislative agenda, nineteen bills, was passed by both houses and sent to the governor for his signature. (Williams)
They did pass a concurrent resolution on the final day of the session that included a memorial to the President of the United States asking for the removal of Governor Dole from office.
It charged that he had hindered the work of the session by his hostility toward the legislature, withheld vital information and reports that were called for, and refused to cooperate with lawmakers. (Williams)
The Hawaiian Star carried the official White House response, “The President (Roosevelt,) after most careful investigation and hearing as many men as possible (sic,) and hearing from others, has come to the conclusion that Governor Dole’s course has been such as to warrant his continuance as Governor of Hawai‘i and entitle him to the respect and hearty support of the Administration.” (Hawaiian Star, April 22, 1902)
Some suggest the make-up of the 1901 Legislature (the first Legislature in the Territory of Hawai‘i) as an example of racial tensions and concern for lack of racial representation of the people.
In 1900, the Kanaka Maoli (aboriginal Hawaiians) had formed their own party, called the Home Rule Party, through merging two organizations, Hui Aloha ‘Āina and Hui Kālai‘āina, who had worked together to support Queen Lili‘uokalani and oppose annexation. (Silva)
That year, the Home Rulers elected Robert Wilcox as Hawaiʻi’s first delegate to the US Congress. (However, on July 10, 1902, Prince Kūhiō split from the Home Rule Party, joined the Republican Party and won the Congressional seat in the election on November 4, 1902.)
Some suggest the early Legislative elections and party affiliations were based on race (Home Rule for Hawaiians and Republicans for whites.) However, it’s interesting to note that in 1901, 1903 and 1905 there was successive decline in representation by Home Rule candidates in the Legislature, although there continued to be a total of around 30-Hawaiians (out of 45) in the Legislature.
The next election (1907,) there was only 1-Home Rule party member serving in the Senate, and none in the House; however, a total of 32-Hawaiians were in the Legislature.
There were more Hawaiians in the 1907 Legislature than the first 1901 session; with Republicans dominating both chambers, it is clear that most of the Hawaiians were Republicans. (While the Home Rule Party was race-based, the Republican Party was not.)
It was shown that Hawaiians did not need the ‘Home Rule’ race-based party to get representation in the local legislature. After a decade of election losses, the Home Rule Party was disbanded after the elections of 1912.
However, Hawaiian representation in the Legislature continued to be just under 30 – out of a total of 45 (15-Senators and 30-Representatives.) (The image shows a Hawai‘i legislative body (1900-1919, not necessarily the legislature of 1901.)
Follow Peter T Young on Facebook
Follow Peter T Young on Google+
Follow Peter T Young on LinkedIn
Follow Peter T Young on Blogger